Asynchronous Client HTTP Transport

By default, CXF uses a transport based on the in-JDK HttpURLConnection object to perform HTTP requests. The HttpURLConnection object uses a blocking model for all IO operations which requires a per-thread execution model. From a pure performance standpoint, this model generally performs very well, but it does have problems scaling when many requests need to be executed simultaneously.

Also, the JAX-WS specification allows for generation of asynchronous methods on generated proxies as well as using asynchronous methods on the Dispatch objects. These methods can take an AsyncHandler object and return a polling Future object so applications do not have to wait for the response. With the HttpURLConnection based transport, CXF was forced to consume a background thread for each outstanding request.

CXF also has an HTTP client transport that is based on the Apache HTTP Components HttpAsyncClient library. Its Maven artifactId is cxf-rt-transports-http-hc. The HttpAsyncClient library uses a non-blocking IO model. This allows many more requests to be outstanding without consuming extra background threads. It also allows greater control over things like Keep-Alive handling which is very difficult or impossible with the HttpURLConnection based transport. However, the non-blocking model does not perform quite as well as the blocking model for pure synchronous request/response transactions.

By default, if the cxf-rt-transports-http-hc module is found on the classpath, CXF will use the HttpAsyncClient based implementation for any Async calls, but will continue to use the HttpURLConnection based transport for synchronous calls. This allows a good balance of performance for the common synchronous cases with scalability for the asynchronous cases. However, using a contextual property of "use.async.http.conduit" and set to true/false, you can control whether the async or blocking version is used. If "true", the HttpAsyncClient will be used even for synchronous calls, if "false", asynchronous calls will rely on the traditional method of using HTTPURLConnection along with a work queue to mimic the asynchronocity.

Another reason to use the asynchronous transport is to use HTTP methods that HttpURLConnection does not support. For example, the github.com REST API specifies the use of PATCH for some cases, but HttpURLConnection rejects PATCH.